Comprehensive Overview of Agentic AI Architectures

The Two Paradigms of Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Framework

A groundbreaking new report provides essential reading for developers: a comprehensive categorization of agentic AI into symbolic (planning-based) and neural (prompt-driven) paradigms.

The Symbolic Paradigm

Planning-Based Agents

Core Characteristics:

• Explicit goal representations
• Formal planning algorithms
• Rule-based decision-making
• Deterministic behavior

Key Technologies:

• PDDL (Planning Domain Definition Language)
• Hierarchical Task Networks (HTN)
• STRIPS planners
• Automated theorem proving

Strengths:

• Interpretable decisions
• Provable correctness
• Predictable behavior
• Efficient for structured problems

Weaknesses:

• Requires formal domain models
• Brittle in undefined situations
• Manual knowledge engineering
• Limited adaptability

The Neural Paradigm

Prompt-Driven Agents

Core Characteristics:

• Learned behaviors from data
• Natural language interaction
• Adaptive responses
• Probabilistic decisions

Key Technologies:

• Large Language Models (LLMs)
• Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
• Fine-tuning and RLHF
• Prompt engineering

Strengths:

• Handles ambiguity well
• Natural language interface
• Learns from examples
• Flexible and adaptive

Weaknesses:

• Unpredictable edge cases
• Hallucination risks
• Difficult to verify
• Resource-intensive

Hybrid Approaches: Best of Both Worlds

Symbolic-Neural Integration:

1. Neural Planning: LLMs generate plans, symbolic systems execute
2. Guided Generation: Symbolic constraints on neural outputs
3. Tool-Using Agents: LLMs select, symbolic tools execute
4. Hierarchical Systems: High-level neural, low-level symbolic

Example Architecture:

User Request → LLM (understanding + high-level plan)
           ↓
   Symbolic Planner (detailed execution plan)
           ↓
   Tool Executors (deterministic actions)
           ↓
   LLM (result synthesis + user communication)

Application Patterns

Symbolic Works Best For:

• Manufacturing automation
• Logistics optimization
• Safety-critical systems
• Regulated industries
• Formal verification needs

Neural Works Best For:

• Customer service
• Content generation
• Research assistance
• Creative tasks
• Unstructured problems

Hybrid Excels At:

• Complex business workflows
• Multi-step problem-solving
• Human-AI collaboration
• Adaptive automation
• Real-world deployment

Future Directions

The report identifies key research areas:

1. Unified Frameworks: Single systems combining both paradigms
2. Automatic Architecture Selection: AI choosing its own approach
3. Explainable Neural Agents: Making LLM decisions interpretable
4. Scalable Symbolic Systems: Handling real-world complexity
5. Meta-Learning: Agents that improve their own architecture

Design Decision Tree

Choosing Your Architecture:

Need formal verification? → Symbolic Handling natural language? → Neural Safety-critical operations? → Symbolic Ambiguous requirements? → Neural Complex multi-step tasks? → Hybrid Rapid prototyping? → Neural Long-term reliability? → Symbolic/Hybrid

Implementation Frameworks

Symbolic:

• Planning.domains
• pyperplan
• Fast Downward
• PDDL Studio

Neural:

• LangChain
• AutoGPT
• BabyAGI
• AgentNEO

Hybrid:

• Semantic Kernel
• LangGraph
• Haystack
• Custom integrations

The Path Forward

The future isn't one paradigm dominating—it's intelligent combination. Successful AI agents will:

• Use symbolic planning for reliability
• Leverage neural flexibility for adaptation
• Combine strengths while mitigating weaknesses
• Adapt architecture to specific use cases

This report is essential reading for anyone building next-generation AI agents.

Build sophisticated hybrid agents with AgentNEO at Arahi AI